BUBLICATION ETHICS

To maintain the quality of the manuscript and avoid publishing violations/plagiarism in the publishing process, the editorial board determines the ethics of the scholarly publication of An-Nahdlah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. These publishing ethics rules apply to writers/authors, editors, reviewers/reviewers, and journal / editorial managers. Publishing ethics refers to the ethical provisions of scholarly publishing set by the COPE (Committee on Publications Ethics) standards.

 

Author Ethics

Reporting; Authors must provide information about their research processes and results to editors honestly, clearly, and thoroughly, and store their research data correctly and securely.

Authenticity and fraud; the author must ensure that the manuscript that has been submitted/submitted to the editor is original, written by himself, sourced from his ideas and ideals, and does not copy the writings or ideas/ideas of others. Authors are strictly prohibited from changing the name of the cited reference source to the name of another person.

Repeat delivery; the author must inform that the manuscript submitted/submitted to the editor is a manuscript that has never been submitted/submitted to the publisher of another journal/publication. If there is an advantage in sending the manuscript to another publisher, the editors will reject the manuscript submitted by the author.

Author status; the author must inform the editor that the author has competencies or qualifications in a particular area of ​​expertise appropriate to the field of science being published, i.e. librarianship. The author who submits the manuscript to the editor is the first author (co-author) so that if a problem is found in the process of publishing the manuscript, it can be resolved immediately.

Scriptwriting errors; the author must immediately notify the editor if there are any errors in the writing of the manuscript, both the results of the survey and the editing. Writing errors include writing names, affiliations/agencies, quotations, and other writing that can reduce the meaning and content of the text. If that happens, the author must immediately suggest improvements to the manuscript.

Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the author must understand the ethics of scholarly publishing above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that the manuscript can be processed smoothly and safely.

Manuscript Production; Authors are not allowed to withdraw manuscripts that have been submitted to An-Nahdlah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. This is because the withdrawal of the manuscript has been futile and takes a lot of time, effort, and process to send to the publisher.

Manuscript Cancellation. Manuscripts that have been published in An-Nahdlah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam are considered based on the decision of the Editorial Board if they meet the provisions of scholarly publication infringement, including (a) There is clear evidence of data falsification, (b) Clear evidence found that the manuscript was previously published in the publisher others, (c) There is clear evidence of fraud, taking the work of another person, etc. from another person making it as if the work were their work. (d) Research that violates norms and ethics. Cancellation of the manuscript will publish the Corrigendum

 

Editor's Ethics

Publication results; editors must ensure that the manuscript review process is thorough, transparent, objective, fair, and discreet. This forms the basis for the editor in deciding on a manuscript, whether to reject or accept. In this case, the editorial board acts as the script selection team.

Publication information; editors must ensure that manuscript writing guidelines for authors and other interested parties are accessible and readable, both in print and electronic versions.

Peer-reviewed manuscript sharing; the editor must ensure that the reviewer and the manuscript material are reviewed, as well as provide clear information to the reviewer on the terms and process of rearranging the manuscript.

Objective and neutral; editors must be objective, impartial, and honest in editing the manuscript, regardless of gender, business, ethnicity, religion, race, intergroup, and nationality of the author.

Confidentiality; editors must properly protect all information, especially concerning the privacy and distribution of the author’s manuscript.

Disclosure of conflicts of interest; editors must understand the ethics of scholarly publishing above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that the process of publishing a manuscript runs smoothly and safely.

 

Reviewer Ethics

Objective and neutral; commentators must be honest, objective, impartial, independent, and only in favor of scientific truth. The process of reviewing the manuscript is carried out professionally without distinguishing between gender, business aspects, ethnicity, religion, race, between groups, and nationality of the author.

Clarity of reference sources; the reviewer must ensure that the source of the reference/text excerpt is appropriate and reliable (accountable). If there are errors or irregularities in the writing of the reference source/citation, the reviewer must immediately notify the editor for correction by the author according to the notes from the reviewer.

Peer effectiveness; the reviewer must respond to the manuscript that has been submitted by the editor and work according to the specified peer review time (maximum 4 weeks). If additional time is required in reviewing the manuscript, it must be immediately reported (confirm) to the editorial secretariat.

Disclosure of conflicts of interest; reviewers must understand the ethics of scholarly publishing above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that the process of publishing a manuscript runs smoothly and safely.

 

Journal Management Ethics

Making decisions; the journal manager/editorial board must explain the mission and goals of the organization, especially those related to policy setting and journal publication decisions without particular interest.

Freedom; Journal managers must give freedom to reviewers and editors to create a comfortable work environment and respect the privacy of authors.

Guarantees and promotions; journal managers must guarantee and protect intellectual property rights (copyrights), and be transparent in managing funds received by third parties (if any). In addition, the journal manager must publish and promote the publication to the public by guaranteeing the benefits of using the manuscript.

Disclosure of conflicts of interest; Journal managers must understand the ethics of scholarly publishing above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that the process of publishing a manuscript runs smoothly and safely.